By TeeJay Petit | Published
Warner Bros. has been under public fire in recent years, due to a series of decisions from the top brass that seem to spit in the face of creative filmmakers and consumers everywhere. As you may already know, the studio shelved a slew of long-awaited films that were already fully finished and ready for release, pulled many beloved projects from their streaming homes, and generally gave workers WGA and SAG-AFTRA union members have had an incredibly difficult time. during last year’s combined strikes. Today, according to an article in the Guardian, Warner Bros. has pulled the plug on the success of Clint Eastwood’s film. Juror #2by preventing the film from being widely released in the United States.
Juror No. 2 will not benefit from wide distribution
The situation with Warner Bros and Juror #2 This is extremely bizarre, because the film should be a big winner for the studio, at least on paper. The film boasts writing and directing from an acclaimed filmmaker with decades of experience in the Hollywood space, an eye-catching cast and a shocking narrative centered on a family man serving as juror, presiding over a crime he may have committed it himself. .
Despite these positive indicators, David Zaslav and company seem determined to prevent the film from succeeding at the box office, limiting it to screening in fewer than 50 theaters nationwide.
Warner Bros. buries the Clint Eastwood film
Despite the slow-roll strategy for Juror #2 in US cinemas, the film has already been released in over 300 cinemas across the UK. Given the film’s unusually American presentation, it seems odd that Warner Bros would alienate such a large portion of the audience. Juror #2the potential audience of . To make matters even stranger, it appears the studio won’t even submit the film to the Oscars, which speaks to a general lack of confidence in the film’s projected performance.
Warner Bros also made a bizarre and almost unprecedented decision by choosing to hide the box office revenues of Juror #2. Such a practice is almost exclusively practiced by direct-to-streaming films. To an outside observer, these measures look like damage control from a studio that has absolutely no confidence in the success or quality of its project – but what could possibly install Warner Bros. with such trepidation? for this film?
Eastwood’s long career has consistently produced financial successes, even when lacking critical acclaim. So there should be no reason for Warner Bros to show such a lack of confidence in Juror #2. Perhaps the 94-year-old filmmaker has internal issues with Warner Bros. executives and his film is being punished for it. This theory has been bandied about by fans ever since Eastwood refused to attend. Juror #2although neither party has said anything to confirm the existence of a behind-the-scenes beef.
Clint Eastwood’s latest film
Despite this, many fans seem to believe that Juror #2 will be Clint Eastwood’s final outing, given his advanced age, which means the film really needs to be treated with some respect. Whether you’re a fan of Eastwood’s work or not, this should absolutely ring alarm bells that Warner Bros is addressing its own financial investment in Juror #2 so bad. This is part of a long list of examples that paint Warner Bros as an incompetent, money-driven company run by small investors who have no understanding of art or the film industry in general.
Source: The Guardian